@TheEastAfrican

Reforms and strategy will help lawyers litigate against large scale government violence

6 days ago, 16:37

By: Sylvie Namwase

In a recent decision by the East African Court of Justice, the East African Law Society lost a petition against the Attorney General of Uganda based on failure to adduce sufficient evidence.

The Law Society brought the petition on behalf of aggrieved Ugandans alleging that Ugandan state security agencies had used excessive force to disperse a series of lawful assemblies in 2011, in what famously came to be dubbed “walk to work protests.”

The protests were against the rising fuel prices and cost of living in Uganda.

The alleged unlawful use of force resulted in the death of about 10 people including two children, unlawful detentions, destruction of property, grave injuries among other violations of the Ugandan Constitution, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Treaty establishing the East African Community.

The evidence, which the petitioners produced to support these claims, consisted of sworn affidavits, a DVD and newspaper clippings. The petitioners did not however produce certain key witnesses for oral testimony and cross-examination.

As part of their main claims, the petitioners maintained that the listed violations had been widely reported in print and electronic media all over the world, and had become so notorious that every person had to have had notice of them.

The Court did not agree. It further noted that given the gravity of the nature of allegations against the respondents, it was only prudent that it only accept evidence that could be verified. Drawing upon various standards evidentiary of the International Criminal Courts, Criminal Tribunals and the European Court on Human Rights, the Court rejected the DVD as inadmissible in evidence.

Finding the petitioners’ evidence weak overall, the court dismissed the petition.

Standard of proof

The loss of this petition on grounds of inadequate evidence demonstrates a major challenge of pursuing domestic justice for victims of large-scale violence by non-democratic states in Africa.

Initiatives taken towards public interest human rights litigation on behalf of victims would offer a suitable way to fill this impunity gap. The standard of proof hereunder is on a balance of probabilities and the victims have more agency and control over their case against the state than they would if public prosecution was their only option.

Unfortunately, the decision also highlights that even though a lower evidentiary burden exists for human rights cases, it is still relatively complex to meet for large-scale human rights violations by state agencies.

It would require litigants to prove multiple violations through identifying and producing many victims as witnesses, gathering and securing forensic and other evidence, all while ensuring witness protection and co-operation from relevant state agencies.

These challenges are arguably similar to those experienced by prosecutors in prominent international courts and tribunals, yet there are no identifiable institutional frameworks or initiatives within the legal fraternity in East Africa and the wider African Continent to offer specific training skills, human resources and funds to match the nature of these challenges.

Lawyers pursuing these cases would likely benefit from strategic approaches on common issues such as ...
Read More


Category: topnews news oped opinion

Suggested

25 minutes
@DailyNation - By: Faith Nyamai
Kuppet threatens to call strike over union dues

The union has issued a 24-hour ultimatum to TSC to release teachers' dues. ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Roselyne Obala And ...
Funds row: Why three counties got Sh14b more

2009 census irregularly increased the population of Garissa, Mandera and Wajir ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Paul Ogemba
Death row convict is found guilty of killing two inmates

The two inmates refused to obey his order to sing a hymn ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Allan Mungai
Why Nyeri home owners have moved into hotels

Residents are abandoning their expensive homes as hardcore gangsters take over ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Cyrus Ombati
Why EACC officers raided Ex-CS Michael Kamau’s home

Family and lawyer protest that raid was carried out without search warrant and in disregard of court order ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@DailyNation - By: Mohamed Ahmed Ib ...
William Ruto cites issues derailing devolution

Deputy President says these issues must be addressed if devolution has to take root. ...

Category: topnews news politics

@TheEastAfrican

Reforms and strategy will help lawyers litigate against large scale government violence

6 days ago, 16:37

By: Sylvie Namwase

In a recent decision by the East African Court of Justice, the East African Law Society lost a petition against the Attorney General of Uganda based on failure to adduce sufficient evidence.

The Law Society brought the petition on behalf of aggrieved Ugandans alleging that Ugandan state security agencies had used excessive force to disperse a series of lawful assemblies in 2011, in what famously came to be dubbed “walk to work protests.”

The protests were against the rising fuel prices and cost of living in Uganda.

The alleged unlawful use of force resulted in the death of about 10 people including two children, unlawful detentions, destruction of property, grave injuries among other violations of the Ugandan Constitution, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Treaty establishing the East African Community.

The evidence, which the petitioners produced to support these claims, consisted of sworn affidavits, a DVD and newspaper clippings. The petitioners did not however produce certain key witnesses for oral testimony and cross-examination.

As part of their main claims, the petitioners maintained that the listed violations had been widely reported in print and electronic media all over the world, and had become so notorious that every person had to have had notice of them.

The Court did not agree. It further noted that given the gravity of the nature of allegations against the respondents, it was only prudent that it only accept evidence that could be verified. Drawing upon various standards evidentiary of the International Criminal Courts, Criminal Tribunals and the European Court on Human Rights, the Court rejected the DVD as inadmissible in evidence.

Finding the petitioners’ evidence weak overall, the court dismissed the petition.

Standard of proof

The loss of this petition on grounds of inadequate evidence demonstrates a major challenge of pursuing domestic justice for victims of large-scale violence by non-democratic states in Africa.

Initiatives taken towards public interest human rights litigation on behalf of victims would offer a suitable way to fill this impunity gap. The standard of proof hereunder is on a balance of probabilities and the victims have more agency and control over their case against the state than they would if public prosecution was their only option.

Unfortunately, the decision also highlights that even though a lower evidentiary burden exists for human rights cases, it is still relatively complex to meet for large-scale human rights violations by state agencies.

It would require litigants to prove multiple violations through identifying and producing many victims as witnesses, gathering and securing forensic and other evidence, all while ensuring witness protection and co-operation from relevant state agencies.

These challenges are arguably similar to those experienced by prosecutors in prominent international courts and tribunals, yet there are no identifiable institutional frameworks or initiatives within the legal fraternity in East Africa and the wider African Continent to offer specific training skills, human resources and funds to match the nature of these challenges.

Lawyers pursuing these cases would likely benefit from strategic approaches on common issues such as ...
Read More

Category: topnews news oped opinion

Suggested

25 minutes
@DailyNation - By: Faith Nyamai
Kuppet threatens to call strike over union dues

The union has issued a 24-hour ultimatum to TSC to release teachers' dues. ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Roselyne Obala And ...
Funds row: Why three counties got Sh14b more

2009 census irregularly increased the population of Garissa, Mandera and Wajir ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Paul Ogemba
Death row convict is found guilty of killing two inmates

The two inmates refused to obey his order to sing a hymn ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Allan Mungai
Why Nyeri home owners have moved into hotels

Residents are abandoning their expensive homes as hardcore gangsters take over ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@StandardMedia - By: Cyrus Ombati
Why EACC officers raided Ex-CS Michael Kamau’s home

Family and lawyer protest that raid was carried out without search warrant and in disregard of court order ...

Category: topnews news
1 hours ago, 00:15
@DailyNation - By: Mohamed Ahmed Ib ...
William Ruto cites issues derailing devolution

Deputy President says these issues must be addressed if devolution has to take root. ...

Category: topnews news politics
Our App